https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168921 Under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, an appeal by the Director of Enforcement was held incompetent where no statutory provision or governmental authorisation was shown to confer authority to institute it. The Court accepted the preliminary objection that, in the absence of demonstrated authority from the Act or the Central Government, the Director could not maintain the appeal against the appellate order. The proper authority to challenge such an order was the Central Government, and the appeal was therefore not maintainable at the Director's instance. en-us Wed, 13 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Apr 2015 14:16:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168921 Under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, an appeal by the Director of Enforcement was held incompetent where no statutory provision or governmental authorisation was shown to confer authority to institute it. The Court accepted the preliminary objection that, in the absence of demonstrated authority from the Act or the Central Government, the Director could not maintain the appeal against the appellate order. The proper authority to challenge such an order was the Central Government, and the appeal was therefore not maintainable at the Director's instance. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 13 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168921