https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168920 Under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, only the Central Government was treated as the aggrieved party entitled to file an appeal to the High Court. The Director of Enforcement, as the original quasi-judicial adjudicating authority, had no implied right to challenge reversal of his own order because such appellate authority must be expressly conferred by statute. In the absence of any indication that the Government of India had filed the appeal or was mistakenly shown as appellant, the appeal in the Director's name was incompetent and not maintainable. en-us Fri, 29 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 May 2015 10:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168920 Under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, only the Central Government was treated as the aggrieved party entitled to file an appeal to the High Court. The Director of Enforcement, as the original quasi-judicial adjudicating authority, had no implied right to challenge reversal of his own order because such appellate authority must be expressly conferred by statute. In the absence of any indication that the Government of India had filed the appeal or was mistakenly shown as appellant, the appeal in the Director's name was incompetent and not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168920