https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168916 The Supreme Court confirmed the judgment of the High Court, dismissing the appeal with costs. It held that Mahadev conveyed all his rights in the suit property to the plaintiff's father under Ex. 78, including the equity of redemption and mortgagee's rights. The sale deed was deemed binding on the appellants, and the decision in Civil Suit No. 80 of 1941 did not constitute res judicata. The plaintiff's father was granted the right to recover possession, and the request to amend the written statement and remit the matter to the trial Court was denied. en-us Fri, 05 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Apr 2015 11:58:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168916 The Supreme Court confirmed the judgment of the High Court, dismissing the appeal with costs. It held that Mahadev conveyed all his rights in the suit property to the plaintiff's father under Ex. 78, including the equity of redemption and mortgagee's rights. The sale deed was deemed binding on the appellants, and the decision in Civil Suit No. 80 of 1941 did not constitute res judicata. The plaintiff's father was granted the right to recover possession, and the request to amend the written statement and remit the matter to the trial Court was denied. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168916