https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168912 The Supreme Court, citing the Capt. M. Paul Anthony case, ruled in favor of the appellant, an employee acquitted in a criminal case related to embezzlement and forgery. Despite the departmental proceedings and a civil suit for recovery of embezzled funds, the court held that the appellant should be reinstated with back wages, continuity of service, and benefits due to the bank's failure to prove the charges. Criticizing the bank's unfair treatment and coercion in obtaining a confession, the court emphasized the appellant's entitlement to back wages and other benefits, setting aside previous orders and judgments. en-us Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Nov 2015 21:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168912 The Supreme Court, citing the Capt. M. Paul Anthony case, ruled in favor of the appellant, an employee acquitted in a criminal case related to embezzlement and forgery. Despite the departmental proceedings and a civil suit for recovery of embezzled funds, the court held that the appellant should be reinstated with back wages, continuity of service, and benefits due to the bank's failure to prove the charges. Criticizing the bank's unfair treatment and coercion in obtaining a confession, the court emphasized the appellant's entitlement to back wages and other benefits, setting aside previous orders and judgments. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168912