<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 397 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168910</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal partly by deleting the addition of Rs. 83,00,000 made on a protective basis under section 143(3) due to procedural non-compliance and lack of corroborative evidence. The addition of Rs. 2,00,000 as income from a gift was confirmed as the assessee had accepted this addition before the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal&#039;s decision resulted in the deletion of the larger addition while upholding the smaller one.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 397 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168910</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal partly by deleting the addition of Rs. 83,00,000 made on a protective basis under section 143(3) due to procedural non-compliance and lack of corroborative evidence. The addition of Rs. 2,00,000 as income from a gift was confirmed as the assessee had accepted this addition before the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal&#039;s decision resulted in the deletion of the larger addition while upholding the smaller one.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>