https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258326 The case involved a dispute over a rebate claim filed by M/s Mission Vivacare Ltd. for the export of goods under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The claim was initially sanctioned but later challenged due to a delay in export timing. The Government's revision order upheld the rebate claim for a portion of the goods exported within the extended period, setting aside the demand for the erroneously refunded rebate amount. The matter was remanded for further adjudication, emphasizing the importance of adhering to export regulations and interpreting relevant notifications for delayed exports. en-us Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258326 The case involved a dispute over a rebate claim filed by M/s Mission Vivacare Ltd. for the export of goods under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The claim was initially sanctioned but later challenged due to a delay in export timing. The Government's revision order upheld the rebate claim for a portion of the goods exported within the extended period, setting aside the demand for the erroneously refunded rebate amount. The matter was remanded for further adjudication, emphasizing the importance of adhering to export regulations and interpreting relevant notifications for delayed exports. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258326