<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 192 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258310</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that a genuine firm existed and was entitled to registration. It found that the firm engaged in business activities by leasing property and collecting rent, which constituted a valid business under the Partnership Act. The court emphasized that the Tribunal&#039;s findings were not perverse and dismissed the appeal in favor of the assessee, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 05:58:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 192 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258310</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that a genuine firm existed and was entitled to registration. It found that the firm engaged in business activities by leasing property and collecting rent, which constituted a valid business under the Partnership Act. The court emphasized that the Tribunal&#039;s findings were not perverse and dismissed the appeal in favor of the assessee, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>