<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 188 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258306</link>
    <description>The court found that the Tribunal&#039;s denial of an adjournment opportunity for medical reasons, leading to the dismissal of stay applications, lacked proper consideration and application of mind. Emphasizing the importance of due consideration in judicial decisions, the court concluded that the impugned order was irrational. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petitions, quashed the order, and allowed the petitioner to file fresh stay applications. The petitioner was advised to avoid unnecessary adjournments, cooperate for prompt resolution, and the Tribunal was directed to decide on the appeals within three months from the next hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 08:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 188 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258306</link>
      <description>The court found that the Tribunal&#039;s denial of an adjournment opportunity for medical reasons, leading to the dismissal of stay applications, lacked proper consideration and application of mind. Emphasizing the importance of due consideration in judicial decisions, the court concluded that the impugned order was irrational. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petitions, quashed the order, and allowed the petitioner to file fresh stay applications. The petitioner was advised to avoid unnecessary adjournments, cooperate for prompt resolution, and the Tribunal was directed to decide on the appeals within three months from the next hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>