<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 184 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258302</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both the Assessee&#039;s and the Revenue&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes, directing a fresh examination by the AO based on the guidelines provided. The key directives included treating the sub-lease amounts as capital receipts, rejecting the principle of mutuality, restricting the assessment of unaccounted income to the incriminating material found, and applying the correct method of accounting based on the Assessee&#039;s role and financial data.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 184 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258302</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both the Assessee&#039;s and the Revenue&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes, directing a fresh examination by the AO based on the guidelines provided. The key directives included treating the sub-lease amounts as capital receipts, rejecting the principle of mutuality, restricting the assessment of unaccounted income to the incriminating material found, and applying the correct method of accounting based on the Assessee&#039;s role and financial data.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>