<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 181 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258299</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(Appeals)&#039; decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The CIT(Appeals) had adequately considered evidence and reasoning for deleting the additions made by the AO. The ITAT found the Revenue had not countered the CIT(Appeals)&#039; findings. Consequently, the appeal and cross-objection were dismissed, and the additions under Section 68 and unexplained expenditure were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 08:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 181 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258299</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(Appeals)&#039; decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The CIT(Appeals) had adequately considered evidence and reasoning for deleting the additions made by the AO. The ITAT found the Revenue had not countered the CIT(Appeals)&#039; findings. Consequently, the appeal and cross-objection were dismissed, and the additions under Section 68 and unexplained expenditure were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>