https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258276 The Tribunal upheld the decision to credit the refund amount to the Consumer Welfare Fund, as the appellant failed to prove that the duty incidence was not passed on to the buyers. The appeal was rejected, affirming the application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment and the proper verification of documentary evidence for refund claims. en-us Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Apr 2015 20:36:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258276 The Tribunal upheld the decision to credit the refund amount to the Consumer Welfare Fund, as the appellant failed to prove that the duty incidence was not passed on to the buyers. The appeal was rejected, affirming the application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment and the proper verification of documentary evidence for refund claims. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258276