<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 151 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258269</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the capital gains declared by the assessee should not be treated as business income. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the consistent treatment of shares as investments, the intention behind the transactions, and relevant judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 14:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 151 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258269</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the capital gains declared by the assessee should not be treated as business income. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the consistent treatment of shares as investments, the intention behind the transactions, and relevant judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>