<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 146 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258264</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded the appeal back to the Tribunal for hearing on merits after the initial appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s order for the 2005-06 assessment year was decided in favor of the assessee. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal for non-attendance and lack of prosecution, upholding assessment order additions due to the appellant&#039;s failure to participate. The CIT(A) did not comply with statutory requirements in disposing of appeals, leading the ITAT to set aside the order and direct the CIT(A) to decide the appeal in accordance with the law, emphasizing the importance of affording the appellant a reasonable opportunity to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 17:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 146 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258264</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded the appeal back to the Tribunal for hearing on merits after the initial appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s order for the 2005-06 assessment year was decided in favor of the assessee. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal for non-attendance and lack of prosecution, upholding assessment order additions due to the appellant&#039;s failure to participate. The CIT(A) did not comply with statutory requirements in disposing of appeals, leading the ITAT to set aside the order and direct the CIT(A) to decide the appeal in accordance with the law, emphasizing the importance of affording the appellant a reasonable opportunity to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>