<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 144 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258262</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty u/s 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2006-07. The tribunal considered the genuine transactions, reasonable explanation provided by the assessee, absence of black money elements, and lack of tax evasion, aligning with legal precedents. The decision emphasized the genuine nature of transactions and reasonable cause, leading to the penalty&#039;s deletion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2015 20:33:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 144 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258262</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty u/s 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2006-07. The tribunal considered the genuine transactions, reasonable explanation provided by the assessee, absence of black money elements, and lack of tax evasion, aligning with legal precedents. The decision emphasized the genuine nature of transactions and reasonable cause, leading to the penalty&#039;s deletion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>