<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 137 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258255</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed all three appeals filed by the revenue, upholding the decisions of the CIT (A) in each case. The additions related to interest paid to others, expenses claimed for personal use, purchase of a Retinal Camera, rejection of books of accounts, interest paid to others (second instance), purchase of property, and unexplained cash credits were deleted after the ITAT found in favor of the assessee based on evidence presented and lack of substantiation by the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 May 2015 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 137 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258255</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed all three appeals filed by the revenue, upholding the decisions of the CIT (A) in each case. The additions related to interest paid to others, expenses claimed for personal use, purchase of a Retinal Camera, rejection of books of accounts, interest paid to others (second instance), purchase of property, and unexplained cash credits were deleted after the ITAT found in favor of the assessee based on evidence presented and lack of substantiation by the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>