<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 134 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258252</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the matter to the TPO for a fresh computation of the ALP of international transactions, excluding Infosys Technologies Limited and Mphasis BFL Limited from the comparables list due to significant differences, particularly in size, functional profile, services offered, and nature of services. The decision was pronounced on 23rd April 2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 May 2015 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 134 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258252</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the matter to the TPO for a fresh computation of the ALP of international transactions, excluding Infosys Technologies Limited and Mphasis BFL Limited from the comparables list due to significant differences, particularly in size, functional profile, services offered, and nature of services. The decision was pronounced on 23rd April 2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>