https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168900 Executive action that directly and immediately threatens the functioning of a newspaper may implicate Article 19(1)(a) and Article 14, so writ petitions under Article 32 were treated as maintainable. The Lieutenant Governor was found to have no authority in relation to the lease or Union property administration, as those powers were not entrusted to him. The re-entry and demolition notices were regarded as arbitrary, mala fide and issued without proper application of mind, and were therefore liable to be quashed. The construction dispute was not treated as an unlawful breach of the planning or lease framework, and the Union was bound by its earlier permission on promissory estoppel. en-us Mon, 07 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Oct 2015 17:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168900 Executive action that directly and immediately threatens the functioning of a newspaper may implicate Article 19(1)(a) and Article 14, so writ petitions under Article 32 were treated as maintainable. The Lieutenant Governor was found to have no authority in relation to the lease or Union property administration, as those powers were not entrusted to him. The re-entry and demolition notices were regarded as arbitrary, mala fide and issued without proper application of mind, and were therefore liable to be quashed. The construction dispute was not treated as an unlawful breach of the planning or lease framework, and the Union was bound by its earlier permission on promissory estoppel. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 07 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168900