https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258244 Common garnishee action under the Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act was challenged in the context of pending statutory revision, with the petitioner alleging disruption to salary payments and routine business liabilities. The High Court did not decide the challenge on merits, noting that the revision remedy was available and, in some matters, already invoked or disposed of. To balance the statutory remedy with immediate hardship, it kept the garnishee order in abeyance for a limited period, directed instalment payment, and required expeditious disposal of the revision proceedings. The garnishee order was not quashed, but limited interim protection was granted. en-us Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Apr 2015 08:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258244 Common garnishee action under the Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act was challenged in the context of pending statutory revision, with the petitioner alleging disruption to salary payments and routine business liabilities. The High Court did not decide the challenge on merits, noting that the revision remedy was available and, in some matters, already invoked or disposed of. To balance the statutory remedy with immediate hardship, it kept the garnishee order in abeyance for a limited period, directed instalment payment, and required expeditious disposal of the revision proceedings. The garnishee order was not quashed, but limited interim protection was granted. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258244