https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258240 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, granting the appellant the full refund amount of Rs. 26,23,366 with interest. The Court held that the refund application was within the limitation period triggered by the excise duty revision notification on 31.10.2000. It was clarified that no unjust enrichment occurred as the duty burden was not passed on to buyers, as evidenced by the appellant crediting the excess amount to the buyers. en-us Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258240 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, granting the appellant the full refund amount of Rs. 26,23,366 with interest. The Court held that the refund application was within the limitation period triggered by the excise duty revision notification on 31.10.2000. It was clarified that no unjust enrichment occurred as the duty burden was not passed on to buyers, as evidenced by the appellant crediting the excess amount to the buyers. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258240