https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258227 Delay of 417 days in filing review applications was held not condonable because the Department had to decide within the 30-day limitation period whether to seek review. Waiting for developments in other matters and later obtaining internal approvals were matters arising after expiry of limitation and could not amount to sufficient cause. Applying the settled principles on delay and the State's obligation to act with diligence, the explanation was found unsatisfactory and the review applications were rejected. en-us Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Aug 2015 10:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258227 Delay of 417 days in filing review applications was held not condonable because the Department had to decide within the 30-day limitation period whether to seek review. Waiting for developments in other matters and later obtaining internal approvals were matters arising after expiry of limitation and could not amount to sufficient cause. Applying the settled principles on delay and the State's obligation to act with diligence, the explanation was found unsatisfactory and the review applications were rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258227