https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168895 Under Article 227, the High Court could not reappreciate evidence or overturn factual findings of the subordinate courts unless the findings were perverse, without evidence, or involved a manifest error of law; the High Court's interference was therefore unwarranted. On Section 15A of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, a statutory tenant could validly grant a licence before 1 February 1973, and a person in occupation as such a licensee on that date was entitled to statutory protection as a tenant. The appeal succeeded and the High Court's order was set aside. en-us Thu, 25 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Jul 2025 11:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168895 Under Article 227, the High Court could not reappreciate evidence or overturn factual findings of the subordinate courts unless the findings were perverse, without evidence, or involved a manifest error of law; the High Court's interference was therefore unwarranted. On Section 15A of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, a statutory tenant could validly grant a licence before 1 February 1973, and a person in occupation as such a licensee on that date was entitled to statutory protection as a tenant. The appeal succeeded and the High Court's order was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168895