<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (11) TMI 102 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168893</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Madras Acts in a case challenging their constitutionality. The Court held that the Acts were protected by Article 31(A) and within the State legislature&#039;s competence. It rejected claims of violations of Articles 14, 19(1)(f), and 31, finding no breach of compensation provisions or legislative competence. The Court dismissed appeals, affirming the Acts&#039; legality without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2015 17:43:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (11) TMI 102 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168893</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Madras Acts in a case challenging their constitutionality. The Court held that the Acts were protected by Article 31(A) and within the State legislature&#039;s competence. It rejected claims of violations of Articles 14, 19(1)(f), and 31, finding no breach of compensation provisions or legislative competence. The Court dismissed appeals, affirming the Acts&#039; legality without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>