https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168881 The majority opinion held that the appellate court and the High Court have jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, even if the trial court could not have done so due to the Act not being in force at the time of conviction. The High Court was directed to make an order under Section 6 of the Act or remand the case to the Sessions Court for such an order. Compliance with mandatory provisions of the Act and the application of beneficial construction for social reform were emphasized. en-us Fri, 10 Apr 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Apr 2015 13:06:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168881 The majority opinion held that the appellate court and the High Court have jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, even if the trial court could not have done so due to the Act not being in force at the time of conviction. The High Court was directed to make an order under Section 6 of the Act or remand the case to the Sessions Court for such an order. Compliance with mandatory provisions of the Act and the application of beneficial construction for social reform were emphasized. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Apr 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168881