<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 83 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258201</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of procedural compliance and fair opportunity for all parties involved in income tax proceedings. The matter was remanded back to the CIT(A) for proper compliance with Rule 46A, directing a re-adjudication of the matter on merits with a fair hearing for both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2015 11:38:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 83 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258201</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of procedural compliance and fair opportunity for all parties involved in income tax proceedings. The matter was remanded back to the CIT(A) for proper compliance with Rule 46A, directing a re-adjudication of the matter on merits with a fair hearing for both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>