<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 80 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258198</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, ruling in favor of the telecom company in the dispute over service tax liability on prepaid services. The Tribunal held that service tax should be based on the amount received from distributors and dealers, as per the law and a previous decision. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals, citing a similar case dismissed by the Apex Court, and deemed the impugned order as correct and legal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2015 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 80 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258198</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, ruling in favor of the telecom company in the dispute over service tax liability on prepaid services. The Tribunal held that service tax should be based on the amount received from distributors and dealers, as per the law and a previous decision. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals, citing a similar case dismissed by the Apex Court, and deemed the impugned order as correct and legal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>