<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 63 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258181</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the petition challenging the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, and the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations, 2009, under Article 14 of the Constitution of India. It upheld the Competition Commission of India&#039;s Final Order imposing a penalty and requiring an undertaking from the petitioner. The Court rejected the application for interim relief, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s obligation to comply with legal directives. The judgment reinforced the importance of evaluating each case on its merits, balancing individual rights with public interest, and maintaining the functionality of the Competition Appellate Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2015 05:59:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 63 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258181</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the petition challenging the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Competition Act, 2002, and the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations, 2009, under Article 14 of the Constitution of India. It upheld the Competition Commission of India&#039;s Final Order imposing a penalty and requiring an undertaking from the petitioner. The Court rejected the application for interim relief, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s obligation to comply with legal directives. The judgment reinforced the importance of evaluating each case on its merits, balancing individual rights with public interest, and maintaining the functionality of the Competition Appellate Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>