<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 62 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258180</link>
    <description>A written statement can satisfy Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when it is the first statement on the substance of the dispute and clearly invokes the arbitration clause; no separate formal application is required if the objection is specific and substantive. The text also states that arbitration under National Stock Exchange bye-laws, framed under Section 9 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 and approved by SEBI, constitutes statutory arbitration under Section 2(4) of the 1996 Act, subject to consistency with the bye-laws. The dispute was treated as referable to arbitration, with the contractual and statutory framework supporting that reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 62 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258180</link>
      <description>A written statement can satisfy Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when it is the first statement on the substance of the dispute and clearly invokes the arbitration clause; no separate formal application is required if the objection is specific and substantive. The text also states that arbitration under National Stock Exchange bye-laws, framed under Section 9 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 and approved by SEBI, constitutes statutory arbitration under Section 2(4) of the 1996 Act, subject to consistency with the bye-laws. The dispute was treated as referable to arbitration, with the contractual and statutory framework supporting that reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>