<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 53 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258171</link>
    <description>Remuneration paid to specified persons under section 40A(2)(b) can be disallowed only where it is shown on a rational and comparable basis to be excessive or unreasonable having regard to market value, business needs and benefit derived; on the facts, the disallowance of directors&#039; remuneration was deleted because no proper comparables or concrete basis supported the estimate. Interest disallowance under section 14A requires an accounts-based determination of expenditure relatable to exempt income, including the source of funds and the method of computation; as the record was inadequate, the interest-disallowance issue was set aside and remanded for fresh decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2015 05:58:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 53 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258171</link>
      <description>Remuneration paid to specified persons under section 40A(2)(b) can be disallowed only where it is shown on a rational and comparable basis to be excessive or unreasonable having regard to market value, business needs and benefit derived; on the facts, the disallowance of directors&#039; remuneration was deleted because no proper comparables or concrete basis supported the estimate. Interest disallowance under section 14A requires an accounts-based determination of expenditure relatable to exempt income, including the source of funds and the method of computation; as the record was inadequate, the interest-disallowance issue was set aside and remanded for fresh decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>