https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258161 The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The CIT(A)'s decision to treat the assessee's share in the property as 1/18th and the application of indexation from 1983-1984 was upheld. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering all evidences, including land records and tax returns of co-owners, to ensure accurate assessment and prevent double taxation. en-us Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Apr 2015 05:57:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258161 The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The CIT(A)'s decision to treat the assessee's share in the property as 1/18th and the application of indexation from 1983-1984 was upheld. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering all evidences, including land records and tax returns of co-owners, to ensure accurate assessment and prevent double taxation. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258161