<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (5) TMI 174 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168866</link>
    <description>Civil courts are ordinarily barred from entertaining suits against demolition and sealing actions under municipal building-control provisions, because the statute provides a special appellate remedy; however, the bar is not absolute where the impugned order is prima facie outside the Act, involves jurisdictional error, or breaches mandatory procedural requirements. Ex parte interim injunctions in such disputes are exceptional and must satisfy the settled tests of prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury. If granted without notice, the court must record reasons, keep the restraint short-lived, ensure prompt service of the pleadings and supporting material, and obtain an undertaking against further construction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:29:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (5) TMI 174 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168866</link>
      <description>Civil courts are ordinarily barred from entertaining suits against demolition and sealing actions under municipal building-control provisions, because the statute provides a special appellate remedy; however, the bar is not absolute where the impugned order is prima facie outside the Act, involves jurisdictional error, or breaches mandatory procedural requirements. Ex parte interim injunctions in such disputes are exceptional and must satisfy the settled tests of prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury. If granted without notice, the court must record reasons, keep the restraint short-lived, ensure prompt service of the pleadings and supporting material, and obtain an undertaking against further construction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>