<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 37 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258155</link>
    <description>Rectification is limited to correcting a mistake apparent from the record and does not permit a review or fresh appraisal of the evidence. A patent, obvious error may be corrected, but an issue requiring reconsideration of material or a different view on the same facts lies outside rectification. On that basis, the Tax Board could not reopen its earlier order in the guise of rectification, and the later rectification order was liable to be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 37 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258155</link>
      <description>Rectification is limited to correcting a mistake apparent from the record and does not permit a review or fresh appraisal of the evidence. A patent, obvious error may be corrected, but an issue requiring reconsideration of material or a different view on the same facts lies outside rectification. On that basis, the Tax Board could not reopen its earlier order in the guise of rectification, and the later rectification order was liable to be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>