<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 35 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258153</link>
    <description>Section 63(8) review jurisdiction is available where material facts were not placed before the Tribunal in the original appeal, and the review remained within the statutory framework because relevant facts about purchase, input tax treatment and subsequent dealing with the cars emerged only at review. A car purchased new from the manufacturer does not become a &quot;used car&quot; merely because it is employed for demonstration before sale. The concessional notification for used cars therefore applies only to transactions involving purchase and sale of used cars, and not to demo cars acquired as new vehicles. The revision petitions failed and the restored tax demand on sale of demo cars was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2016 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 35 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258153</link>
      <description>Section 63(8) review jurisdiction is available where material facts were not placed before the Tribunal in the original appeal, and the review remained within the statutory framework because relevant facts about purchase, input tax treatment and subsequent dealing with the cars emerged only at review. A car purchased new from the manufacturer does not become a &quot;used car&quot; merely because it is employed for demonstration before sale. The concessional notification for used cars therefore applies only to transactions involving purchase and sale of used cars, and not to demo cars acquired as new vehicles. The revision petitions failed and the restored tax demand on sale of demo cars was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>