<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 4 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258122</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Departmental appeal, affirming the cancellation of penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The penalties were canceled as the non-disclosure of Rs. 45 lakhs was deemed an inadvertent mistake rectified within the permissible time, and the penalty on the estimated addition for the sale of the plot lacked concrete evidence. The order was pronounced on September 13, 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 06:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 4 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258122</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Departmental appeal, affirming the cancellation of penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The penalties were canceled as the non-disclosure of Rs. 45 lakhs was deemed an inadvertent mistake rectified within the permissible time, and the penalty on the estimated addition for the sale of the plot lacked concrete evidence. The order was pronounced on September 13, 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>