<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (9) TMI 404 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168856</link>
    <description>The article explains that, under the Act&#039;s inclusive definitions and deeming provision, a sick textile undertaking covers all assets, rights and property relating to the undertaking, so the hosiery section could be brought within takeover and nationalisation despite earlier separate treatment under another statute. It also states that closure of the spinning section, being the company&#039;s major and substantial activity, could amount in substance to closure of the textile undertaking even if a minor segment continued to operate, provided the materials did not show permanent closure beyond revival. On that basis, the takeover framework and nationalisation were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (9) TMI 404 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168856</link>
      <description>The article explains that, under the Act&#039;s inclusive definitions and deeming provision, a sick textile undertaking covers all assets, rights and property relating to the undertaking, so the hosiery section could be brought within takeover and nationalisation despite earlier separate treatment under another statute. It also states that closure of the spinning section, being the company&#039;s major and substantial activity, could amount in substance to closure of the textile undertaking even if a minor segment continued to operate, provided the materials did not show permanent closure beyond revival. On that basis, the takeover framework and nationalisation were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>