https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168851 The Court ruled in favor of the appellants and writ petitioners, directing the market committees to refund the excess market fees collected under Haryana Act No. 32 of 1977. Emphasizing the obligation to return wrongly collected funds without any limitation period hindrance, the Court proposed a scheme for refund and redistribution of excess amounts to ensure justice for all parties involved. The Court exercised its discretionary powers under Article 226 to provide equitable relief and outlined a procedure for efficient processing of claims and payments, ultimately disposing of the appeals and writ petitions with directions for refund and redistribution. en-us Fri, 09 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Mar 2015 17:02:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168851 The Court ruled in favor of the appellants and writ petitioners, directing the market committees to refund the excess market fees collected under Haryana Act No. 32 of 1977. Emphasizing the obligation to return wrongly collected funds without any limitation period hindrance, the Court proposed a scheme for refund and redistribution of excess amounts to ensure justice for all parties involved. The Court exercised its discretionary powers under Article 226 to provide equitable relief and outlined a procedure for efficient processing of claims and payments, ultimately disposing of the appeals and writ petitions with directions for refund and redistribution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168851