<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 344 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168844</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court condemned the Calcutta High Court&#039;s practice of granting interim orders on oral applications, deeming it reminiscent of feudal practices and forbidding it under the Constitution. The auction process for a liquor shop in Rangat, Andaman Islands was disrupted by a status quo order from the Calcutta High Court, leading to a flawed procedure and a subsequent direction for a fresh auction. Doubts regarding the authenticity of parties involved were raised, prompting the Supreme Court to withdraw additional demands and initiate contempt proceedings. The Court stressed the importance of written records and transparency in judicial proceedings, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:39:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 344 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168844</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court condemned the Calcutta High Court&#039;s practice of granting interim orders on oral applications, deeming it reminiscent of feudal practices and forbidding it under the Constitution. The auction process for a liquor shop in Rangat, Andaman Islands was disrupted by a status quo order from the Calcutta High Court, leading to a flawed procedure and a subsequent direction for a fresh auction. Doubts regarding the authenticity of parties involved were raised, prompting the Supreme Court to withdraw additional demands and initiate contempt proceedings. The Court stressed the importance of written records and transparency in judicial proceedings, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>