<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 626 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168840</link>
    <description>Change of land use under the planning statute must strictly satisfy the conditions in the enabling provision and remain consistent with the Outline Development Plan and zoning regulations. Section 14-A applied only to limited corrections or changes justified by topographical or similar errors, public interest, and conformity with planning law. A residential plot could not be converted for restaurant use where the zoning regulations did not permit it and the sanction order did not show compliance with the statutory requirements or address relevant objections such as traffic and parking impact. An order passed without application of mind to mandatory planning requirements is vulnerable in judicial review, and the conversion permission was held invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 626 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168840</link>
      <description>Change of land use under the planning statute must strictly satisfy the conditions in the enabling provision and remain consistent with the Outline Development Plan and zoning regulations. Section 14-A applied only to limited corrections or changes justified by topographical or similar errors, public interest, and conformity with planning law. A residential plot could not be converted for restaurant use where the zoning regulations did not permit it and the sanction order did not show compliance with the statutory requirements or address relevant objections such as traffic and parking impact. An order passed without application of mind to mandatory planning requirements is vulnerable in judicial review, and the conversion permission was held invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>