<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 575 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168833</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, after which the Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with the impugned central excise decision and dismissed the Special Leave Petition. The order records no further reasoning on the merits and reflects a summary refusal to entertain the challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:35:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 575 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168833</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, after which the Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with the impugned central excise decision and dismissed the Special Leave Petition. The order records no further reasoning on the merits and reflects a summary refusal to entertain the challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>