https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168832 The tenant's statutory right to be deemed a purchaser on the tillers' day was held to have vested under the tenancy law and to survive the proviso to section 8 of the Maharashtra Revenue Patels (Abolition of Office) Act, 1962. The court applied the principle that a legal fiction conferring an accrued right must be given full effect, and that a proviso cannot be read to destroy a substantive vested right unless the statute clearly so provides. Section 8 was construed as only postponing the operative date for re-grant, not abrogating purchase rights, and section 32-O was therefore inapplicable. The tenant's entitlement under section 32-G was upheld. en-us Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Nov 2015 21:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168832 The tenant's statutory right to be deemed a purchaser on the tillers' day was held to have vested under the tenancy law and to survive the proviso to section 8 of the Maharashtra Revenue Patels (Abolition of Office) Act, 1962. The court applied the principle that a legal fiction conferring an accrued right must be given full effect, and that a proviso cannot be read to destroy a substantive vested right unless the statute clearly so provides. Section 8 was construed as only postponing the operative date for re-grant, not abrogating purchase rights, and section 32-O was therefore inapplicable. The tenant's entitlement under section 32-G was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168832