https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258116 The court ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the respondent to promptly refund the service tax despite multiple challenges and legal proceedings. The judgment highlighted the failure to implement the refund order following the rejection of the stay application, emphasizing the necessity of refunding the service tax to the petitioner. Additionally, the court addressed the issue of interest on the service tax refund, directing an increased rate of interest based on the circumstances of the case. The court underscored the importance of adhering to the appellate order for refund and ultimately sided with the appellant in ensuring the timely refund of the service tax. en-us Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258116 The court ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the respondent to promptly refund the service tax despite multiple challenges and legal proceedings. The judgment highlighted the failure to implement the refund order following the rejection of the stay application, emphasizing the necessity of refunding the service tax to the petitioner. Additionally, the court addressed the issue of interest on the service tax refund, directing an increased rate of interest based on the circumstances of the case. The court underscored the importance of adhering to the appellate order for refund and ultimately sided with the appellant in ensuring the timely refund of the service tax. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258116