<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1024 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258090</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the exclusion of certain companies from the comparables list based on turnover and functional dissimilarity. Companies with high Related Party Transactions were also excluded. The issue of including reimbursement of expenses received from the Associated Enterprise as part of operating costs was remanded for verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=380038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1024 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258090</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the exclusion of certain companies from the comparables list based on turnover and functional dissimilarity. Companies with high Related Party Transactions were also excluded. The issue of including reimbursement of expenses received from the Associated Enterprise as part of operating costs was remanded for verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>