https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168826 Public street hawking is protected as a trade under Article 19(1)(g), but only as a regulated activity subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(6); no fundamental right exists to occupy any particular pavement space or obstruct pedestrian use. The screening of NDMC and MCD hawker claims was upheld as necessary to exclude bogus claims, but the framework was refined to allow genuine claimants to rely on alternative evidence, receive fresh public notice and objections, and obtain appropriate interim protection. The result was a regulated, area-specific regime intended to preserve both public access and bona fide livelihoods. en-us Fri, 13 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Mar 2015 18:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168826 Public street hawking is protected as a trade under Article 19(1)(g), but only as a regulated activity subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(6); no fundamental right exists to occupy any particular pavement space or obstruct pedestrian use. The screening of NDMC and MCD hawker claims was upheld as necessary to exclude bogus claims, but the framework was refined to allow genuine claimants to rely on alternative evidence, receive fresh public notice and objections, and obtain appropriate interim protection. The result was a regulated, area-specific regime intended to preserve both public access and bona fide livelihoods. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168826