https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168821 Repeated government orders and long-standing conduct created an enforceable right for compliant Nazul land lessees to renewal or fresh lease on the earlier terms, and the State could not impose later restrictive conditions after lessees had acted on the representation. The 1981 order was invalid to the extent it conflicted with the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 by narrowing renewal rights and reworking the operative unit of computation. Selective renewal and failure to issue notices to some lessees were held arbitrary and contrary to Article 14. Delay did not bar mandamus where the authorities themselves had kept the matter unresolved. In the evacuee-property matter, the auction condition supported automatic renewal for 25 years without premium. en-us Tue, 25 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:51:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168821 Repeated government orders and long-standing conduct created an enforceable right for compliant Nazul land lessees to renewal or fresh lease on the earlier terms, and the State could not impose later restrictive conditions after lessees had acted on the representation. The 1981 order was invalid to the extent it conflicted with the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 by narrowing renewal rights and reworking the operative unit of computation. Selective renewal and failure to issue notices to some lessees were held arbitrary and contrary to Article 14. Delay did not bar mandamus where the authorities themselves had kept the matter unresolved. In the evacuee-property matter, the auction condition supported automatic renewal for 25 years without premium. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168821