https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168816 No right of hearing accrued to a petitioner who was not the licence-holder and had no direct role in the appeal against cancellation of the licence. The appeal was confined to the licence-holder and the licensing authority, and the petitioner was not shown to have any legal entitlement to participate in those proceedings. The contention that the appellate order was vitiated for denial of hearing to the petitioner was therefore rejected. en-us Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:06:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168816 No right of hearing accrued to a petitioner who was not the licence-holder and had no direct role in the appeal against cancellation of the licence. The appeal was confined to the licence-holder and the licensing authority, and the petitioner was not shown to have any legal entitlement to participate in those proceedings. The contention that the appellate order was vitiated for denial of hearing to the petitioner was therefore rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168816