https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258053 The court held that the administrative head lacked authority to nullify orders under the RTI Act, emphasizing the need to follow proper legal channels for relief. It highlighted the importance of maintaining the hierarchy of forums for adjudication and stated that orders, even if null, remain effective until set aside by a competent body or court. The impugned order denying information was set aside, allowing respondents to challenge earlier decisions through appropriate legal avenues, while directing the petitioner to seek redressal through the Central Information Commission under Section 18 of the RTI Act for alleged administrative misconduct. en-us Fri, 05 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Nov 2017 14:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258053 The court held that the administrative head lacked authority to nullify orders under the RTI Act, emphasizing the need to follow proper legal channels for relief. It highlighted the importance of maintaining the hierarchy of forums for adjudication and stated that orders, even if null, remain effective until set aside by a competent body or court. The impugned order denying information was set aside, allowing respondents to challenge earlier decisions through appropriate legal avenues, while directing the petitioner to seek redressal through the Central Information Commission under Section 18 of the RTI Act for alleged administrative misconduct. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258053