<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 984 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258050</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter for fresh consideration, requiring the petitioner to deposit the entire tax amount demanded. The petitioner was directed to appear before the authority with objections and documents by a specified date, with the warning of restoration of the impugned order in case of non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 06:02:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 984 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258050</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter for fresh consideration, requiring the petitioner to deposit the entire tax amount demanded. The petitioner was directed to appear before the authority with objections and documents by a specified date, with the warning of restoration of the impugned order in case of non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>