<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 948 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258014</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partially modified the appellant&#039;s appeal in a case concerning the interpretation of Notification No. 24/2011-cus on exemption for gold and silver content in imported copper concentrate. It clarified that only the mining company&#039;s assay report is recognized for duty exemption, with no provision for alternative agency reports. The Tribunal suggested considering the lesser value between provisional and final assay reports for exemption when the final assay is from a different agency. The decision highlighted the necessity of strict compliance with the notification&#039;s requirements for duty exemption eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 15:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 948 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258014</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partially modified the appellant&#039;s appeal in a case concerning the interpretation of Notification No. 24/2011-cus on exemption for gold and silver content in imported copper concentrate. It clarified that only the mining company&#039;s assay report is recognized for duty exemption, with no provision for alternative agency reports. The Tribunal suggested considering the lesser value between provisional and final assay reports for exemption when the final assay is from a different agency. The decision highlighted the necessity of strict compliance with the notification&#039;s requirements for duty exemption eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>