<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 925 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257991</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to treat the loss as a business loss instead of speculation loss, emphasizing the significant role of financing in the assessee&#039;s business activities. The Tribunal also confirmed the transactions with related parties as sham, based on discrepancies identified by the Assessing Officer. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed all appeals for the Assessment Years 2007-08 and 2008-09, maintaining the decisions regarding the treatment of loss and the characterization of transactions as sham.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 925 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257991</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to treat the loss as a business loss instead of speculation loss, emphasizing the significant role of financing in the assessee&#039;s business activities. The Tribunal also confirmed the transactions with related parties as sham, based on discrepancies identified by the Assessing Officer. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed all appeals for the Assessment Years 2007-08 and 2008-09, maintaining the decisions regarding the treatment of loss and the characterization of transactions as sham.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>