<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Impact of Change of Service tax liability structure from partial reverse charge to full reverse charge on manpower Supply and Security Services in transition period</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6178</link>
    <description>Amendment making manpower and security services subject to full reverse charge from 01-04-2015 moves provider-borne tax to the service recipient and creates transitional conflicts under the Point of Taxation Rules: general POT is invoice or payment (earlier), but reverse charge is governed by Rule 7 (payment date), with Rule 3 displacing Rule 7 if payment is delayed beyond three months. This timing interplay can cause disputes over whether 25% remains provider-liable or 100% becomes recipient-liable for transactions spanning the amendment. A practical mitigation is obtaining supplier declarations accepting liability for pre-amendment provider share so recipients can apply 75% reverse charge on pre-amendment bills.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2015 07:05:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2015 07:05:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Impact of Change of Service tax liability structure from partial reverse charge to full reverse charge on manpower Supply and Security Services in transition period</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6178</link>
      <description>Amendment making manpower and security services subject to full reverse charge from 01-04-2015 moves provider-borne tax to the service recipient and creates transitional conflicts under the Point of Taxation Rules: general POT is invoice or payment (earlier), but reverse charge is governed by Rule 7 (payment date), with Rule 3 displacing Rule 7 if payment is delayed beyond three months. This timing interplay can cause disputes over whether 25% remains provider-liable or 100% becomes recipient-liable for transactions spanning the amendment. A practical mitigation is obtaining supplier declarations accepting liability for pre-amendment provider share so recipients can apply 75% reverse charge on pre-amendment bills.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2015 07:05:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>