<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Against Applicant on Erroneous Rebate Claim; Original Authority&#039;s Duty Demand Stands Unchallenged.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22273</link>
    <description>Recovery of erroneously sanctioned rebate claim - Since they have not disputed the revised rate of rebate and demand of duty determined by original authority, there is no force in contention of applicant that rebate initially sanctioned was in order. - CGOVT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 11:32:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 11:32:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=379808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Against Applicant on Erroneous Rebate Claim; Original Authority&#039;s Duty Demand Stands Unchallenged.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22273</link>
      <description>Recovery of erroneously sanctioned rebate claim - Since they have not disputed the revised rate of rebate and demand of duty determined by original authority, there is no force in contention of applicant that rebate initially sanctioned was in order. - CGOVT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 11:32:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>